Economics are fundamental to just about everything. Indeed, the success of any economic system requires a strong economic foundation beginning with the individual and the individual family unit. The proof of this principle is replete throughout history. Economics are essential to the moral threads that hold families and societies together. To be succinct, the best use of this definition may lie in the legislatures within which to frame all law and better define the meniscus between the powers and duties of the State versus the authorities and responsibilities of the people.
This assumption is the basis of most law, but not necessarily regulations that carry the force of law. It is extortion against civil liberty. Therefore any law or regulation that creates an adversarial relationship between the State and the legitimate activities of the innocent citizen at large and for the sake of expediency must not stand. This is the difference between deterrence by just law and mere prevention by regulation. If the law does not serve justice in a free society it serves nothing at all.
Mere order can be enforced and attained by tyranny and oppression of the populace. An example of the latter can be demonstrated by the late Spanish dictator Franco who dispatched pairs of Guardia armed with sub-machine guns to every populated corner of Spain. Government is force; like fire, it is a dangerous servant— and a fearful master. Again, the duty of the State is to enhance and facilitate the responsible exercise of individual authority, not to presumptively impede it.
When the Free individual engages his environment he has three choices under the option of his personal authority. These are his choices. If he, by his own efforts, accomplishes the service or task for himself he of course retains responsibility for the consequences of the accomplishment. If he chooses to abandon the chore and leave it undone, he also inherits the consequences of his neglect or inattention.
If he obtains the services of another individual or individuals he, by his own choice, extends his authority by consent to such parties. However he cannot transfer his authority. The responsibility for the consequences remains with him. The principle is simple. The individual cannot legally forfeit or abandon his freedom or his right to that freedom. His freedom is represented by his individual authority. Inherent in that authority is responsibility for the consequences of the exercise of that authority. Thus the responsibility for the consequences also remains with the individual.
The liberty and responsibility of any individual cannot be forfeited except by due process of law and only for just or compelling cause prescribed in law. You may have to live with the consequences. Unfortunately the legal profession has succeeded in significantly eroding this duty. This does in no way abrogate the obligations of contracts.
The contractor accepts, by his own authority, certain obligations specifically or by reasonable implication the responsibility for those duties set forth in the contract at the risk of being subject to certain penalties ascribed therein. It is the opinion of theBushwhacker that no public representative should ascend to or be sustained in office without knowing how to define freedom and why that is important.
Individuality is then forfeited for the good of the whole.
- cry the beloved country critical essays?
- essay about myself 250 words.
- my favourite tv show essay.
- Essay on Rights and Responsibilities of Citizens for Students.
- Liberty means responsibility essay.
- Freedom and responsibility?
- ucf application essay help!
The end, therefore, justified the means to that end. Thus the rise of the dictator class who initially seemed to bring such order to society.
In the end it brought misery and death to millions. Ironically even many in the West, including Charles Lindbergh, were initially seduced by such movements. It should be remembered that no two liberal democracies have ever made war on each other. The duty of the state of a free people is to enhance and facilitate the sovereignty of the individual such that he can successfully achieve and manage his own economic destiny thus enabling him to bear the burden of his responsibilities.
The free man thus becomes an economic asset of a free economy. The perceived duty of the socialist state is to relegate the individual to a simple and insignificant member of the masses to be managed, as an economic liability, by the state. You choose. Much more could be said but the reader has enough to think about for now. Did the foregoing challenge your preconceptions? Did it infringe on your comfort zone? Your fortress of myth?
If so, all for the better. Leave your thoughts, ask your questions and think!!. Freedom is not Free! Diligence is required. If you want to promote and preserve the cause of genuine freedom pass on the definition to others. Tags: authority and responsibility , Constitutional law and freedom , freedom and law , freedom definition , individuality , liberty , liberty and license , Meaning of freedom , what means freedom. You can leave a response , or trackback from your own site. You must be logged in to post a comment.
Liberty: Definition, Features, Types and Essential Safeguards of Liberty
Pages About The Bushwhacker. The Right to Defend!
In the second place liberty carries, with itself a kind of restraint on his own freedom for the sake of adjustment of similar freedom of others in the state. Thus there are provisions for punishment in the criminal code for those who exceed the limits put on their freedom.
Liberty can be divided into five kinds — natural liberty, civil liberty, political liberty, economic liberty and national liberty. In modern states there cannot be any natural liberty.
This type of liberty might have existed in the pre-state stage of human civilisation. According to Jean Jacques Rousseau, the people enjoyed natural liberty in the state of nature and men lost such liberty with the creation of the state. Natural liberty is an unlimited and unrestricted freedom.
This concept of liberty is imaginary and cannot exist in a civilised society. This type of liberty is actually license. Only the strong can enjoy the right in a jungle life. The weak will be exploited. Might can be right in a jungle, not in a civil community. So we reject the natural liberty as a bogus one. Civil liberty implies freedom enjoyed by the people in a civil society.
This type of liberty emanates from the civil rights which include right to life, liberty and property. These are the basic civil amenities, without which a man, whether he is a citizen or an alien, cannot lead a civil life. It is also the bounden duty of the state to provide these opportunities to the individuals in the state. About civil liberty, R. Political liberty stands for the political rights to have a share in the government.
Such political liberty is possible only in a democracy.
- Long and Short Essay on Rights and Responsibilities of Citizens in English!
- Liberty Means Responsability essays;
- Liberty means responsibility essay.
The democratic functions of the state will be impossible if the state does not provide its citizens with political liberty. Political liberty is identical with the constitutional liberty which means democratic rule.
The Five Conceptions of American Liberty
In order to make political liberty real, the citizens will have four political rights, which are discussed below:. The citizens will have the right to vote on attaining majority to elect the legislature. In India the voting age is from 18 years.